Online Discussion: Gender Bias in Temples

Q. Do you agree with this observation: "what is assumed to be a 'temple' is essentially a structure built around very simple natural rock formations. The structure then is the boundary that defines and delimits the sacred space around something very organic and natural. This creation of boundaries is the essence of patriarchy, for with boundaries come divisions and hierarchies, that prop up the privileged. The physical boundaries express psychological boundaries that emerged long ago, before the structures, before gods and goddesses" 

After reading the article and ongoing debate on gender bias in temples/mosques/churches, what is your opinion about it?

My Ans.

Respected sir,

Two ideas I like most are (1) The sterility of neo-Vedanta popularized by male-dominated monastic Hindu 'missions' in the early 20th century, where God has no gender, or sexuality, hence looks upon men and women equally. (2) To encourage Kumbhmela like rituals which not involve any artificial structure and everybody can participate and enjoy it.

I do not agree with the said observation that it is assumed to be a 'temple' is essentially a structure built around very simple natural rock formations. I think Hindu temple is a spiritual destination for many Hindus (not all) and the idols within the temple has been energized to bring well being to them. I think male privilege in idol worship accelerated post Vedic era. I couldn’t trace exact reason for women discrimination in some temples like shani dev temple or ayyappa temple, may be particular belief or patriarchal inheritance. But I strongly believe that there should be no any gender based discrimination against women at any temple. 

Thanks.